Archive for April, 2007

Are trees good for us?

17th 2007f April, 2007, Peter

A group of climate modelers have found some counter-intuitive results from eliminating the world’s trees. Apparently, the impact of forests partly depends on which latitudes they are in. Report from The Economist:
“When Dr Bala ordered global clearcutting, the model calculated that the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide levels would roughly double by 2100. [...]

Carbontax.org

16th 2007f April, 2007, Peter

Yet another new blog in the USA — this one devoted to promoting the idea of a carbon tax. It’s hard to imagine groups lobbying IN FAVOUR of a tax, but that shows the concern which people have regarding the possibility and effects of [tagclimate change[/tag]. We, however, would prefer an emissions [...]

The New Carbon Cycle

15th 2007f April, 2007, Peter

In our part of the blogosphere, dealing with carbon emissions trading, we’ve not found many other blogs. We’ve just encountered one which is new to us: The New Carbon Cycle. Being the work of Scott Deatherage, an environmental lawyer based in Dallas TX, it naturally enough focuses on US developments in carbon [...]

Oil sees light!

14th 2007f April, 2007, Peter

US oil major ConocoPhillips has become the first US oil company to support publicly mandatory caps on emissions. Here is the company’s press-release:
“HOUSTON, April 11, 2007 — ConocoPhillips [NYSE:COP] today announced its support for a mandatory national framework to address greenhouse gas emissions and has joined the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), a [...]

Economist favours tax!

14th 2007f April, 2007, Peter

The Financial Times “undercover economist”, Tim Harford, reports on the differences between emissions trading schemes and carbon taxes, in this article. He declares in favour of a tax, since a tax may be more readily altered than a trading scheme, as circumstances change.
“The uncertainty about next year’s emissions is not very [...]